Prof. Robert Berwick's abstract for his forthcoming invited talk at the ACL2016 workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning revives an ancient debate. Entitled "Why take a chance?", Berwick seems to refer implicitly to Chomsky's critique of the statistical approach of Harris as well as the currently dominant paradigms in CoNLL.
Berwick avoids Chomsky's use of "innate" but states that "the debate over the existence of sophisticated mental grammars was settled with Chomsky's Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (1957/1975)", acknowledging that "this debate has often been revived".
This paper agrees with the view that this debate has long since been settled, but with the opposite outcome! Given the embers have not yet died away, and the questions remain fundamental, perhaps it is appropriate to refuel the debate, so I would like to join Bob in throwing fuel on this fire by reviewing the evidence against the Chomskian position!
DONATE to arXiv: One hundred percent of your contribution will fund improvements and new initiatives to benefit arXiv's global scientific community. Please join the Simons Foundation and our generous member organizations and research labs in supporting arXiv. https://goo.gl/QIgRpr
from cs.AI updates on arXiv.org http://ift.tt/29ddQZK
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment